Joe Stephenson’s attempt to update Robert Louis Stevenson’s novella “Strange Case of Doctor Jekyll and Mr Hyde” results in a cringe-worthy disappointment. This contemporary reimagining, brought to us by Hammer Films known for their delightfully lurid gothic pulp films of the 1950s and 60s, falls tragically short. Eddie Izzard takes on the role of Dr. Nina Jekyll, a recluse and pharmaceutical magnate, with exaggerated facial expressions and self-indulgent gestures that border on comical.
The excessive chewing of scenery in this film is so pronounced that one might wonder if they had cast an industrial woodchipper in the lead role. Scott Chambers plays Rob, an ex-convict and former addict who finds himself entangled in the disturbing world of Dr. Jekyll. However, his performance pales in comparison to the over-the-top antics of Izzard, leaving the audience yearning for more substance.
Stephenson’s misguided attempt at modernization not only fails to capture the essence of Stevenson’s novella but also lacks the eerie charm and atmospheric tension typical of Hammer Films’ earlier works. Instead, we are left with a laughable and regrettable adaptation that feels like a disservice to the source material.
The film’s shortcomings are not limited to its performances. The screenplay, riddled with clichés and predictable plot points, does little to engage the viewer. The narrative unfolds in a disjointed manner, often sacrificing coherence for cheap thrills. Any attempts to explore the psychological depth of the original story fall flat, as the characters and their motivations are reduced to shallow caricatures.
Visually, the film offers little respite from its other flaws. The cinematography lacks creativity and fails to create a distinct visual identity. Scenes that should have evoked a sense of dread and suspense come across as amateurish and uninspired. Even the makeup and visual effects, crucial for capturing the transformation of Jekyll into Hyde, are disappointingly underwhelming.
It is disheartening to witness such a missed opportunity. Stevenson’s novella continues to be a timeless exploration of the dual nature of humanity, delving into the dark recesses of the human psyche. Yet, this adaptation fails to grasp the depth and nuance of the original work, reducing it to a shallow and forgettable imitation.
In conclusion, Joe Stephenson’s attempt at updating Robert Louis Stevenson’s “Strange Case of Doctor Jekyll and Mr Hyde” falls embarrassingly short. The exaggerated performances, lackluster screenplay, and uninspired visuals contribute to a film that fails to capture the essence of the source material or the atmospheric charm of Hammer Films’ earlier productions. It is a regrettable misstep in the realm of literary adaptations, leaving audiences longing for a more faithful and compelling retelling of this iconic tale.
