Emma Thompson: ‘Content’ is an impolite term, and she’s spot on.

The widespread usage of the term “content” in today’s era, where the boundaries between various platforms are becoming increasingly blurred, has come under scrutiny due to the recent Hollywood strikes. These strikes have shed light on how this seemingly innocuous phrase can diminish the value of creative endeavors.

In an age where media consumption is dominated by digital platforms and streaming services, the term “content” has gained immense popularity. It has become a catch-all phrase encompassing everything from movies, television shows, web series, podcasts, and even social media posts. While its usage may appear convenient and practical, it has inadvertently downplayed the artistic and intellectual effort put into creating such works.

The recent spate of strikes in Hollywood has brought attention to the negative implications of using the term “content.” These labor disputes, initiated by writers, actors, and other creatives, highlight how the commodification of their craft has led to a devaluation of their work. By referring to their creations as mere “content,” the intricate process of storytelling, character development, and thought-provoking narratives is reduced to a generic, interchangeable commodity.

Artistic expression is diminished when creativity is packaged and labeled as “content.” The term suggests a homogenization of diverse forms of entertainment, erasing the uniqueness and individuality that each creation possesses. By categorizing all creative works as “content,” the industry risks promoting a formulaic approach, where artistic innovation takes a back seat to profit-driven production.

Furthermore, the term “content” fails to recognize the emotional and cultural impact that creative works have on audiences. Movies, television shows, and other forms of entertainment often serve as a reflection of society, providing commentary on pressing issues, challenging norms, and sparking important conversations. By reducing these creations to mere “content,” their potential to inspire change and influence public discourse is undermined.

The Hollywood strikes serve as a wake-up call for the industry to reassess its language and treatment of creative works. It is crucial to acknowledge the dedication, skill, and vision that go into producing these pieces of art. By using a more nuanced and respectful vocabulary, we can restore the value and appreciation for the labor-intensive process behind every film, show, or piece of media.

In conclusion, while the term “content” may have gained popularity in an era where platforms intersect and blend, its usage has inadvertently devalued creative work. The recent Hollywood strikes have shed light on the negative consequences of reducing artistic expression to a generic commodity. It is vital for the industry to reevaluate its language choices and recognize the distinctiveness and impact of each creative endeavor. By doing so, we can reaffirm the value of storytelling, innovation, and meaningful cultural contributions in the world of entertainment.

Joseph Mitchell

Joseph Mitchell