One-third of companies find NIS2 nonsensical: survey.

The NIS2 legislation is facing limited support from the business community. Telindus research reveals that 32 percent of the organizations affected by NIS2 consider the legislation irrelevant. NIS2 legislation will require organizations to have their cybersecurity in order, including mandatory reporting and registration, as well as a necessary risk assessment. Many companies are hesitant to embrace these new requirements due to concerns about the associated costs, administrative burdens, and potential disruptions to their operations.

The Telindus study highlights various reasons behind the skepticism towards NIS2. One major concern is the perceived ambiguity surrounding the legislation. Organizations are uncertain about the specific requirements they need to meet to comply with NIS2 standards. The lack of clarity regarding technical specifications and implementation guidelines has left many businesses feeling unsure about how to proceed.

Moreover, some companies argue that the responsibility for cybersecurity should primarily lie with specialized agencies rather than individual businesses. They believe that centralizing cybersecurity efforts would be more efficient and cost-effective, allowing organizations to focus on their core competencies while relying on dedicated experts to ensure adequate protection against cyber threats.

Furthermore, the financial implications of implementing NIS2 measures are a significant worry for businesses. Upgrading existing infrastructure, acquiring advanced cybersecurity tools, and hiring skilled professionals to meet the stringent requirements can impose a substantial financial burden, particularly for smaller companies with limited resources. The fear of increased costs without a clear return on investment has contributed to the negative sentiment towards NIS2 among certain organizations.

Administrative concerns also play a role in the opposition to NIS2. The additional paperwork and reporting obligations required by the legislation can be seen as bureaucratic hurdles that divert valuable time and resources away from core business activities. Some companies argue that the focus should be on fostering innovation and growth rather than dealing with extensive compliance procedures.

Despite the reservations expressed by a portion of the business community, it is important to note that cybersecurity remains a critical issue in the digital age. The increasing frequency and sophistication of cyberattacks pose significant risks to organizations, their customers, and the overall stability of the digital economy. While there may be differing opinions on how best to address these challenges, it is essential for businesses to prioritize cybersecurity and take proactive measures to protect their operations and sensitive data.

In conclusion, the NIS2 legislation is met with skepticism by a notable portion of the business community. Concerns about unclear requirements, financial implications, administrative burdens, and a preference for centralized cybersecurity efforts contribute to this opposition. Nonetheless, given the escalating cyber threats faced by organizations today, it remains crucial for businesses to recognize the importance of cybersecurity and take appropriate actions to safeguard their assets.

Matthew Clark

Matthew Clark