France and Germany’s Scheme to Reel UK Back into EU Without Referendum, Assisted by Starmer: The “Macron’s Onion” Plot to Coax Britain as an “Associate”

A recently published 60-page document puts forth the intriguing proposition that the United Kingdom, yes, even the UK itself, could potentially make a comeback within the framework of an “outer tier” of members. This proposal has sparked considerable interest and speculation among analysts and policymakers alike.

The notion of the UK rejoining an outer tier of members harks back to its departure from the European Union in 2020. While Brexit was widely regarded as a definitive severance of ties between the UK and the EU, this paper challenges the conventional wisdom by suggesting a potential pathway for the UK’s reintegration, albeit in a modified capacity.

The concept of an outer tier is not entirely unprecedented. Historically, similar approaches have been employed in various international organizations to accommodate countries with distinct relationships and varying levels of integration. The proposed outer tier membership would provide the UK with a unique position, allowing it to engage with the EU on specific issues while maintaining a degree of autonomy.

Advocates of this idea argue that the UK’s reentry into an outer tier could yield significant advantages for both parties involved. Proponents contend that it would enable the UK to regain access to certain benefits of EU membership, such as participation in key economic initiatives and the ability to influence decision-making processes that affect its interests. At the same time, the EU could benefit from the UK’s expertise and resources, leveraging its global reach and economic strength to bolster collective endeavors.

Naturally, the suggestion of the UK returning as part of an outer tier has ignited debates and raised pertinent questions. Skeptics question the viability and desirability of such an arrangement. They argue that the UK’s departure from the EU was a deliberate choice made by the British public through a democratic referendum, and any attempt to dilute or reverse that decision could undermine the principle of democratic governance.

Furthermore, critics argue that establishing an outer tier within the EU’s institutional framework may complicate the already intricate dynamics of the Union. It could potentially create a tiered system that introduces new complexities in decision-making processes, institutional structures, and power dynamics.

However, proponents of this concept emphasize the need for creative and flexible solutions to address the complex challenges posed by Brexit. They contend that an outer tier arrangement could provide a middle ground that respects the UK’s sovereignty while fostering collaboration on shared objectives.

As discussions surrounding the UK’s future relationship with the EU continue to evolve, the notion of an outer tier membership remains an intriguing prospect. While its feasibility and practicality are still subject to rigorous analysis and negotiation, this proposal injects fresh ideas into the ongoing discourse surrounding the UK’s post-Brexit trajectory. Only time will tell whether such a vision can find common ground and pave the way for a renewed partnership between the UK and the EU within the framework of an outer tier of members.

David Baker

David Baker