Osiptel confirms fine for Bitel’s failure to comply with complaint resolution.

The Telecommunications Private Investment Supervisory Agency (Osiptel) has rejected the appeal filed by Vietel S.A.C. against Resolution No. 036-2023-TRASU/PAS/OSIPTEL. As a result, Bitel will be required to pay the imposed fine of 4.5 UIT (S/ 23,175).

In its decision, Osiptel upheld the previous resolution and dismissed Vietel S.A.C.’s arguments. The company had sought to challenge the penalty imposed on them for violating telecommunications regulations.

This ruling signifies a setback for Vietel S.A.C., as they will now have to comply with the monetary punishment determined by Osiptel. The fine of 4.5 UIT, which amounts to S/ 23,175, highlights the seriousness of the infractions committed by Bitel.

Osiptel’s role as the regulatory authority for private investments in telecommunications is to ensure fair competition and adherence to industry regulations. The agency closely monitors compliance by telecommunication companies like Bitel to maintain a level playing field in the sector.

The rejected appeal indicates that Osiptel found no grounds to overturn its initial decision. The regulatory body thoroughly reviewed the arguments presented by Vietel S.A.C. but ultimately deemed them insufficient or unconvincing.

By affirming the original resolution, Osiptel emphasizes the importance of enforcing penalties for non-compliance. This decision sends a clear message that any violations of telecommunications regulations will be met with appropriate consequences.

Bitel, as one of the major players in the telecommunications market, must now fulfill its obligation to pay the imposed fine. Failure to do so could lead to further legal actions or additional sanctions from Osiptel.

Furthermore, this ruling serves as a reminder to all telecommunications companies operating in Peru to remain vigilant in adhering to the established rules and regulations. Osiptel’s unwavering commitment to maintaining a fair and competitive market encourages compliance among industry players.

In conclusion, Osiptel’s rejection of Vietel S.A.C.’s appeal reinforces the importance of upholding telecommunications regulations. Bitel’s obligation to pay the 4.5 UIT fine demonstrates that non-compliance will not be tolerated in the industry. This decision serves as a reminder to all telecommunication companies to operate within the boundaries of the law and maintain fair competition in the market.

David Baker

David Baker