Gunnar Schupelius, a prominent commentator, asserts that numerous politicians have overlooked a fundamental principle: the state’s responsibility lies in ensuring security and order, not in the upbringing of adult individuals. In today’s society, it seems that this essential distinction has been disregarded by those in power.
The role of the state is to safeguard the welfare of its citizens, creating an environment where people can live their lives free from fear and chaos. It encompasses maintaining law and order, protecting against external threats, and promoting social harmony. However, Schupelius argues that some politicians have lost sight of these core principles, erroneously assuming that the state should extend its influence into the realm of personal education and development.
Education, particularly of adults, falls under the purview of individuals themselves, and perhaps more appropriately, private institutions. Encouraging personal growth, expanding knowledge, and cultivating critical thinking are responsibilities that primarily rest with the individual. Government intervention in this domain risks overstepping boundaries and infringing upon personal freedoms, inhibiting the autonomy and self-determination of citizens.
Schupelius contends that the erosion of this crucial distinction stems from a misguided belief that the state must assume a paternalistic role, dictating how individuals should think, behave, and even raise their children. This ideological shift is characterized by an increasing tendency to encroach on personal matters that fall outside the traditional scope of governance.
It is imperative to recognize that personal freedom and individual responsibility are the cornerstones of a democratic society. Citizens have the right to make their own choices, exercise their own judgment, and bear the consequences of their actions. By reducing the sphere of personal autonomy, the state risks undermining the very fabric of our democratic values.
Furthermore, this blurring of boundaries between state and individual has far-reaching implications for society as a whole. When the state assumes undue control over personal matters, it fosters a culture of dependency and stifles individual initiative. Moreover, the diversity and dynamism of society suffer as creativity and innovation are impeded by excessive regulation.
Schupelius’s critique serves as a reminder that politicians should refocus their efforts on fulfilling the core responsibilities of the state: ensuring the safety and orderliness of society. By upholding these fundamental principles, politicians can create an environment conducive to personal growth and flourishing. It is essential to reestablish the boundaries between state and individual, safeguarding the autonomy and freedom that underpin a thriving democratic society.
